Theft of Government Property lawyer Fairfax, VA

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Theft of Government Property lawyer Fairfax, VA



Theft of Government Property lawyer Fairfax, VA

Federal theft of government property charges are prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia — the same federal district that serves Fairfax County and the City of Fairfax. A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 641 exposes a defendant to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, where incarceration is calculated on a point system with no parole. If you or someone close to you has received a target letter, a subpoena, or an arrest warrant, the next step is to retain a defense attorney with federal court experience before the investigation advances further. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys represent clients facing theft-of-government-property allegations throughout Northern Virginia, from the U.S. District Courthouse in Alexandria to matters investigated by the FBI, IRS‑CI, or other federal agencies. To schedule a consultation, call (888) 437-7747.

What Federal Theft of Government Property Means in Fairfax, VA

In Virginia, federal criminal jurisdiction is separate from the state courts that handle most local offenses. Theft of government property is charged under 18 U.S.C. § 641 when the government alleges that a person knowingly received, concealed, or retained property belonging to the United States with intent to convert it to their own use. The statute covers a broad range of conduct — from misdirected benefit payments to fraudulent procurement of government equipment — and the Eastern District of Virginia, often called the “rocket docket,” moves cases quickly once an indictment is returned.

Fairfax County residents facing a federal theft investigation will generally have their case handled in the Alexandria Division of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys appear regularly in that courthouse and understand the procedural pace, the expectations of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the local federal magistrate-judge practices that can affect pretrial release, discovery, and suppression motions. Because federal agents may have been building a case for months before a charge is filed, early legal involvement is critical to preserve evidence, assess charging risks, and begin a proactive defense. The firm’s Fairfax location provides a nearby point of contact for clients throughout Fairfax, Burke, Centreville, Chantilly, Herndon, Reston, McLean, Vienna, Tysons, Oakton, Springfield, Annandale, and the Falls Church area.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Federal Theft of Government Property Cases

Federal theft-of-government-property cases typically begin with an investigation by an agency such as the FBI, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, or the IRS Criminal Investigation division. The government must present evidence to a grand jury to obtain an indictment, and once indicted, the accused faces an initial appearance, a detention hearing, and arraignment before the matter proceeds to pretrial motions and potentially trial. Throughout each stage, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys scrutinize the government’s evidence for weaknesses — whether the property was in fact owned by the United States, whether the defendant had the requisite intent to steal or convert, and whether any constitutional violations occurred during the investigation.

Sentencing in the federal system is driven by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which calculate an advisory range based on the offense level and the defendant’s criminal history. For theft offenses, the value of the property and the nature of the loss often determine the offense level. The firm’s defense strategy includes working with forensic accountants and valuation attorneys where necessary, negotiating with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for charge reductions or downward departures, and — when the facts support it — preparing a detailed sentencing memorandum that argues for a variance below the guideline range. Because parole was abolished in the federal system, every day of a federal sentence is served, making thorough preparation at the sentencing phase especially important.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris is the Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has been practicing since 1997. A former prosecutor, Mr. Sris brings firsthand insight into how the government builds its cases. He testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, he maintains a multi-state practice that spans the federal courts across all five jurisdictions.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys contribute additional depth to the federal defense team. Each Of Counsel attorney is an independent practitioner who contracts directly with Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., and together Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience. Results may vary. A significant portion of the firm’s practice is devoted to federal criminal defense, and clients benefit from a collaborative approach that draws on the collective trial experience and motion-practice knowledge of attorneys who have appeared in the Eastern District of Virginia, the Western District of Virginia, and other federal courts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is theft of government property under federal law?

Theft of government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641 means knowingly receiving, concealing, or retaining any record, voucher, money, or thing of value belonging to the United States with the intent to convert it to one’s own use or gain. The federal statute is broader than many state theft laws because it covers not only taking government property but also the knowing possession of stolen government property. The government must prove that the property belonged to the United States and that the defendant acted with criminal intent. The charge can arise from relatively small-dollar incidents as well as complex procurement-fraud schemes.

Do I need a lawyer if I am charged with theft of government property in Fairfax?

Yes — retaining a federal criminal defense attorney immediately is essential because federal theft charges carry serious consequences, including imprisonment, fines, and restitution orders that are enforced without the possibility of parole. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia has a high conviction rate, and federal defendants face a complex pretrial process that includes detention hearings, discovery obligations, and often a presentence investigation report that will influence the judge’s final sentence. An attorney can also engage with the prosecutor before indictment to potentially persuade the government not to seek charges or to limit their scope.

How does the federal criminal process differ from a state criminal case?

Federal criminal procedure is governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, involves a grand jury indictment for felony charges, and leads to sentencing under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines — a system that does not allow parole. Unlike Virginia state courts, where many cases resolve in the General District Court, federal felony matters proceed in the U.S. District Court, and the prosecution is handled by an Assistant United States Attorney with substantial investigative resources behind them. The federal bail statute also imposes a different detention standard, and the discovery process is shaped by the Jencks Act and the government’s obligations under Brady v. Maryland.

What are possible defenses to a federal theft of government property charge?

Possible defenses include lack of intent to steal, absence of government ownership of the property, insufficient evidence of conversion, and constitutional challenges such as an unlawful search or seizure. In some cases, the defense may argue that the accused believed in good faith that they had a right to the property or that the government’s loss calculation is overstated, which can affect the sentencing guideline range. Every defense is fact-specific, and Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys evaluate the investigation file, the chain of custody, and any statements made by the accused before determining the strongest strategy for trial or negotiation.

What should I do if I am under investigation but have not been charged?

Contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney before speaking to any investigator, and preserve all documents and electronic records that may be relevant to the inquiry. Do not discuss the matter with coworkers, friends, or family members, as those conversations are not privileged and can be used against you. An attorney can contact the investigating agency on your behalf, assess whether a charge is likely, and begin building a defense well before an indictment is returned — a period that is often the most valuable window for shaping the outcome. To discuss your situation, call (888) 437-7747.

How do I find a federal criminal defense lawyer near Fairfax?

Look for a lawyer who routinely appears in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and who has experience with the theft-of-government-property statute under which you are being investigated or charged. Federal practice is distinct from state court, and familiarity with the local federal judges, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines is critical. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. maintains a Fairfax location and serves clients throughout Northern Virginia; the firm can be reached at (888) 437-7747 to schedule a consultation.

Related Federal Criminal Defense Resources

Fairfax County Federal Criminal Lawyer
Falls Church Federal Criminal Lawyer
Prince William County Federal Criminal Lawyer
Manassas Federal Criminal Lawyer
Manassas Park Federal Criminal Lawyer

Official Legal Resources

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
18 U.S.C. § 641 – Theft of Government Property

Last reviewed: July 2026

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Results may vary.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.

All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.